<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for There and Back Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com</link>
	<description>The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.2-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX Resources by ajax ? &#124; bi teknoloji</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/ajax-resources/#comment-467697</link>
		<dc:creator>ajax ? &#124; bi teknoloji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/ajax-reference/#comment-467697</guid>
		<description>[...] Ajax Resources: There and Back Again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ajax Resources: There and Back Again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX Hello World with HTML_AJAX by PEAR Tutorials &#124; PHP kitchen</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/08/17/ajax-hello-world-with-html_ajax/#comment-467655</link>
		<dc:creator>PEAR Tutorials &#124; PHP kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/08/17/ajax-hello-world-with-html_ajax/#comment-467655</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/08/17/ajax-hello-world-with-html_ajax/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/08/17/ajax-hello-world-with-html_ajax/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/08/17/ajax-hello-world-with-html_ajax/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with GD: Solved by joeri</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/10/11/problems-with-gd/#comment-467362</link>
		<dc:creator>joeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/?p=194#comment-467362</guid>
		<description>Suddenly the tone changed... what happend?

Im an artists myself and find the terms used by GD about opacity very confussing.

imagesavealpha($im,true);

save??? what to disc? preserve the alpha? Yeah why not? 
Just let me load a 24 or 32 bit image and leave me alone with commands about what to do with the channels... Dooh... what next? 
imagesavered($im,true); imagesaveblue($im,true); imagesavegreen($im,true); 

imagealphablending($im,true);
can't GD adopt terms Gimp and Photoshop use?

Forget about imagealphablending, just give me composite tools.

$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_DEFAULT );
( just a 32bit image over a 32bit image, thank you very much )
and why not add:
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_ADD );
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_MULTIPLY );
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_MASK, $img_mask );

Reading the Manual does not change GD not giving expected behavior, it only changes my expectations. There is a difference.
Its not a bug, so sorry for not filing it Pierre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suddenly the tone changed&#8230; what happend?</p>
<p>Im an artists myself and find the terms used by GD about opacity very confussing.</p>
<p>imagesavealpha($im,true);</p>
<p>save??? what to disc? preserve the alpha? Yeah why not?<br />
Just let me load a 24 or 32 bit image and leave me alone with commands about what to do with the channels&#8230; Dooh&#8230; what next?<br />
imagesavered($im,true); imagesaveblue($im,true); imagesavegreen($im,true); </p>
<p>imagealphablending($im,true);<br />
can&#8217;t GD adopt terms Gimp and Photoshop use?</p>
<p>Forget about imagealphablending, just give me composite tools.</p>
<p>$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_DEFAULT );<br />
( just a 32bit image over a 32bit image, thank you very much )<br />
and why not add:<br />
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_ADD );<br />
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_MULTIPLY );<br />
$newimage= imagecomposite($img_under, $img_over, GD_MASK, $img_mask );</p>
<p>Reading the Manual does not change GD not giving expected behavior, it only changes my expectations. There is a difference.<br />
Its not a bug, so sorry for not filing it Pierre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on phpDocumentor enhancements by aric caley</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/07/13/phpdocumentor-enhancements/#comment-461873</link>
		<dc:creator>aric caley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/07/13/phpdocumentor-enhancements/#comment-461873</guid>
		<description>My solution to this is to define the property or method, but then unset them in the constructor so that __call/__get/__set can handle them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My solution to this is to define the property or method, but then unset them in the constructor so that __call/__get/__set can handle them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery Image Strip by 强烈推荐：240多个jQuery插件 - 胡言乱语</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/01/11/jquery-image-strip/#comment-454252</link>
		<dc:creator>强烈推荐：240多个jQuery插件 - 胡言乱语</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/01/11/jquery-image-strip/#comment-454252</guid>
		<description>[...] jQuery lightBox plugin. jQuery Image Strip. jQuery slideViewer. jQuery jqGalScroll 2.0. jQuery - jqGalViewII. jQuery - jqGalViewIII. jQuery [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] jQuery lightBox plugin. jQuery Image Strip. jQuery slideViewer. jQuery jqGalScroll 2.0. jQuery - jqGalViewII. jQuery - jqGalViewIII. jQuery [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery Image Strip by jQuery插件集合.(240) &#124; Sapling soliloquize</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/01/11/jquery-image-strip/#comment-448857</link>
		<dc:creator>jQuery插件集合.(240) &#124; Sapling soliloquize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/01/11/jquery-image-strip/#comment-448857</guid>
		<description>[...] jQuery lightBox plugin. jQuery Image Strip. jQuery slideViewer. jQuery jqGalScroll 2.0. jQuery - jqGalViewII. jQuery - jqGalViewIII. jQuery [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] jQuery lightBox plugin. jQuery Image Strip. jQuery slideViewer. jQuery jqGalScroll 2.0. jQuery - jqGalViewII. jQuery - jqGalViewIII. jQuery [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX File upload Progress by Dinesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/01/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446282</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/04/29/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446282</guid>
		<description>Joshua,
///////////
This may sound like a simple or even stupid question, but how would I store or capture that a good session has started? How would I do the error handling for a failed session? I will eventually figure it out as I usually do, but I hope I dont have to waste any more time with this.  :-)
////////////
By the way, I am running Apache 2.2, ext3 filesystem, php 5.2 and the latest ubuntu server with updates, but I am still unable to pass the 1.99GB barrier.
///////////
apache2 -v says:
Server version: Apache/2.2.4 (Ubuntu)
///////////
php -v on command line says:
PHP 5.2.3-1ubuntu6.3 (cli) (built: Jan 10 2008 09:38:37)
///////////
PHP web environment says:
PHP Version 5.2.3-1ubuntu6.3
///////////
Will switching to a 64bit hardware and OS version be a guaranteed fix for this issue?
///////////
Dinesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,<br />
///////////<br />
This may sound like a simple or even stupid question, but how would I store or capture that a good session has started? How would I do the error handling for a failed session? I will eventually figure it out as I usually do, but I hope I dont have to waste any more time with this.  <img src='http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
////////////<br />
By the way, I am running Apache 2.2, ext3 filesystem, php 5.2 and the latest ubuntu server with updates, but I am still unable to pass the 1.99GB barrier.<br />
///////////<br />
apache2 -v says:<br />
Server version: Apache/2.2.4 (Ubuntu)<br />
///////////<br />
php -v on command line says:<br />
PHP 5.2.3-1ubuntu6.3 (cli) (built: Jan 10 2008 09:38:37)<br />
///////////<br />
PHP web environment says:<br />
PHP Version 5.2.3-1ubuntu6.3<br />
///////////<br />
Will switching to a 64bit hardware and OS version be a guaranteed fix for this issue?<br />
///////////<br />
Dinesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX File upload Progress by Joshua Eichorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/01/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446034</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Eichorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/04/29/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446034</guid>
		<description>Dinesh:
I belive the problem is that you can get a null response for 2 reasons.  The upload is complete or it failed.  I was just suggesting storing that you've started a good upload  in the session to differentiate.

The 2gb limit shouldn't be due to a OS limit on any modern system.  But only apache 2.2 &gt; support files over 2gb and I have no clue about the PHP upload processing code which is what really matter in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dinesh:<br />
I belive the problem is that you can get a null response for 2 reasons.  The upload is complete or it failed.  I was just suggesting storing that you&#8217;ve started a good upload  in the session to differentiate.</p>
<p>The 2gb limit shouldn&#8217;t be due to a OS limit on any modern system.  But only apache 2.2 > support files over 2gb and I have no clue about the PHP upload processing code which is what really matter in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX File upload Progress by Dinesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/01/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446022</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/04/29/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-446022</guid>
		<description>Joshua,
////////
Re: #1: I am not sure I understand your response. I will need some more time to think about your response and research it. Re: #2: Would it be possible to bypass the 2 GB linux file limit for 32bit OS'es if I created a raw partition for the files?...or would the OS still impose that 2 GB limit on that partition? I know that this is off topic, but any help would be greatly appreciated. I read something about LFS support (large file system), but will that work for Apache/PHP also?
////////
From what I read on the php list, you are right, it is not a priority, but I wish it was.
////////
Thanks
Dinesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,<br />
////////<br />
Re: #1: I am not sure I understand your response. I will need some more time to think about your response and research it. Re: #2: Would it be possible to bypass the 2 GB linux file limit for 32bit OS&#8217;es if I created a raw partition for the files?&#8230;or would the OS still impose that 2 GB limit on that partition? I know that this is off topic, but any help would be greatly appreciated. I read something about LFS support (large file system), but will that work for Apache/PHP also?<br />
////////<br />
From what I read on the php list, you are right, it is not a priority, but I wish it was.<br />
////////<br />
Thanks<br />
Dinesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX File upload Progress by Joshua Eichorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/01/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-445872</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Eichorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/04/29/ajax-file-upload-progress/#comment-445872</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure on #1, maybe a null after a good value is complete and a null before a good value is an error.  You could track the status in the session.

For #2 its doubtful that files over 2gb work (at least on 32bit oses)  normally you have to do special stuff to go larger and i doubt thats been a priority.  If you want the details you should ask on a general php list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure on #1, maybe a null after a good value is complete and a null before a good value is an error.  You could track the status in the session.</p>
<p>For #2 its doubtful that files over 2gb work (at least on 32bit oses)  normally you have to do special stuff to go larger and i doubt thats been a priority.  If you want the details you should ask on a general php list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
