Comments on: Everything is back up

By: Drew

Drew — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:22:13 +0000

Josh,

Gotcha on that one. That is definately something I will be looking forward too should it ever make it to production!

By: Joshua Eichorn

Joshua Eichorn — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:28:46 +0000

Drew:
There currently isn’t support for autodetecting the content size. You can set the browser width/height from 75×75 to 1280×2048

I do have some auto scrolling code in testing which would allow infinite height but its has some bugs that are keeping it out of production.

Feel free to email me josh@bluga.net if you have any more questions

By: Drew

Drew — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:47:46 +0000

Hi Josh,

Awesome service you have here. I have a question. Some pages that I am going to be capturing will be larger then a normal browser window (scrollbars). Is there a command that can currently be sent to either
1. Automatically detect the current browser size and adjust the browser capture size to this size? I know something must be in there to do that, as you can pass this information (abnormally wide and/or tall layouts) as part of the width & height captures.
2. If the above is not possible, is there anyway for me to detect this information and pass it to your api?

By: Tony E. Nazzal

Tony E. Nazzal — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:02:01 +0000

AJAX enabled Content Management System:
I plan on making this an open source project in the near future. The majority of this project was done with PHP, HTML/CSS and Javascript. If you want to help work on this project, you can email me at therealtony13@gmail.com

Features :

* moo.fx, a superlightweight javascript effects library.
* Sajax, An open source XMLHTTPRequest toolkit with PHP
* CSS/HTML themeable layout with custom tags
* Object Oriented
* Automatic AJAX enabled Form generator with file support
* Realtime Chat
* Content Rating
* Dynamic Content
* Easy to create Expansion Modules (unlimited versatility)
* AJAX Search
* Secure User Authentication
* Not a single page reload
* WYSIWYG based content editor and creator
http://tonynazzal.blogspot.com/2008/06/full-ajax-based-cms.html

By: Joshua Eichorn

Joshua Eichorn — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:20:37 +0000

Ray:

I think the difference is just anti-aliasing on font rendering. The image in both screen captures looks identical to me.

By: Ray Paseur

Ray Paseur — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:19:56 +0000

Josh, I just tried it again and it worked great. Thanks for your help. If you can, tell me a little more about how the rendering engine gets its view of the web page. For example, I notice that even with 1280 wide PNG output the text appears a little soft. The pictures are pretty faithful to the original, but look marginally softer, like they may have been through one set of JPG compression or some such thing. Does gecko do this?

Here is a link to the file from BLUGA:
http://www.imaginedb.com/webthumb/bluga.png

Here is the direct screen capture (Firefox) made with PaintShopPro:
http://www.imaginedb.com/webthumb/capture.png

The screen capture is a smaller file, possibly because the capture has no dithering? Not sure why.

Best regards, and thanks for your help, ~Ray

By: Joshua Eichorn

Joshua Eichorn — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:37:03 +0000

Ray:

I emailed you as well but you were actually hitting a bug that was causing extra resizing.

I just finished the upgrade of everything to the Gecko 1.9 rendering engine and 1280×1024 full thumbnails should be working correctly now. You just need to make sure you add fullthumb to your request and set png to the output type.

By: Joshua Eichorn

Joshua Eichorn — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:33:53 +0000

Bob:

For some reason your hitting my abuse checking from the front page. I provide an API and I don’t want people trying to abuse that form. If you reload the front page things should work. If not you can always sign up for an account and that should fix things.

By: Bob Walsh

Bob Walsh — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 01:05:13 +0000

I get the following error trying your service from your home page in FF3 or Safari:

Error, currentId, front page submission requires cookies, and a reload of the front page between thumbnail submissions

Care to comment?

By: Ray Paseur

Ray Paseur — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:06:28 +0000

Josh, I seem to be doing something wrong. I cannot get the 1280 x 1024 webthumb capture to work. It returned 1024 x 786 (not 768, 786). So a couple of questions:

1. Am I missing something?
2. Do you license the software you use to do the “screen capture” of the site?

My objective is a very high quality image (probably a PNG) of a screen capture, similar to what I would get from visiting a web site and doing the equivalent of a pixel-by-pixel copy of the screen.

Thanks, Ray