<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks for your thoughts on improving PEAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Markus Wolff</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192703</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 10:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192703</guid>
		<description>I'm sure this came up already, but just in case, and be it only to add one more voice to the count, I'm all for providing a Wiki for package documentation. DocBook is all good and well from an academic point of view, but it has always hindered writing end-user docs for many, many packages and many people either don't know how or are simply unwilling to use it.

A wiki would be a much easier way to add docs, IMHO, leading to more docs being written. Granted, you can't transform Wiki markup to other output formats as easily as with DocBook, but honestly, how many people need to do that? Personally, I've never touched any other documentation format than HTML and I don't know of anyone who did.

Should some people insist on having other output formats, I am pretty sure a converter can be written if you really, really want/need one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this came up already, but just in case, and be it only to add one more voice to the count, I&#8217;m all for providing a Wiki for package documentation. DocBook is all good and well from an academic point of view, but it has always hindered writing end-user docs for many, many packages and many people either don&#8217;t know how or are simply unwilling to use it.</p>
<p>A wiki would be a much easier way to add docs, IMHO, leading to more docs being written. Granted, you can&#8217;t transform Wiki markup to other output formats as easily as with DocBook, but honestly, how many people need to do that? Personally, I&#8217;ve never touched any other documentation format than HTML and I don&#8217;t know of anyone who did.</p>
<p>Should some people insist on having other output formats, I am pretty sure a converter can be written if you really, really want/need one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: developercast.com &#187; Joshua Eichorn&#8217;s Blog: Thanks for your thoughts on improving PEAR</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192435</link>
		<dc:creator>developercast.com &#187; Joshua Eichorn&#8217;s Blog: Thanks for your thoughts on improving PEAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192435</guid>
		<description>[...] up from a previous post of his that got lots of great feedback, Joshua Eichorn has posted his own thanks, not only for the responses to his own thoughts but to the PEAR community as a whole.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up from a previous post of his that got lots of great feedback, Joshua Eichorn has posted his own thanks, not only for the responses to his own thoughts but to the PEAR community as a whole.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHPDeveloper.org</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192409</link>
		<dc:creator>PHPDeveloper.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 18:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2007/05/08/thanks-for-your-thoughts-on-improving-pear/#comment-192409</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joshua Eichorn's Blog: Thanks for your thoughts on improving PEAR...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joshua Eichorn&#8217;s Blog: Thanks for your thoughts on improving PEAR&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
