<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webthumb adds login and quick submit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IDIA</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-214819</link>
		<dc:creator>IDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-214819</guid>
		<description>It's not work corect with URL like this:http://www.kaldata.com/forums/index.php?showforum=32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not work corect with URL like this:http://www.kaldata.com/forums/index.php?showforum=32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Eichorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34275</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Eichorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34275</guid>
		<description>Chris:
I'm not hoping to make much money, but it would nice for it too pay for a server to run itself on.  Of course I wouldn't mind if its crazy popular and makes tons of money, but im not sure that the market is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:<br />
I&#8217;m not hoping to make much money, but it would nice for it too pay for a server to run itself on.  Of course I wouldn&#8217;t mind if its crazy popular and makes tons of money, but im not sure that the market is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shiflett</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34273</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shiflett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34273</guid>
		<description>Good points. :-)

Personally, both services seem so cheap that I'd go with whichever offers better features. For volumes where the cost difference matters, I'm not sure what features would be important.

Out of curiosity, are you hoping to make much money from this project?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. <img src='http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Personally, both services seem so cheap that I&#8217;d go with whichever offers better features. For volumes where the cost difference matters, I&#8217;m not sure what features would be important.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, are you hoping to make much money from this project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Eichorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34264</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Eichorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34264</guid>
		<description>Chris: 
Yeah i guess the question there, are the features im offering worth it.  AWS offers you thumbnails that they've taken at there last crawl of the web.  In my checking that means usually an monthly update.

Webthumb offers the following on top of AWS:
Thumbs of sites how it looks today
More thumbnail sizes
Thumbnails from any url

What is doesn't offer:
Immediate thumbnails, getting your thumbnail is an async process since were making it of the site while you wait.

So i guess the services are similar but not the same, but its a certainty that even aws can't sell thumbs of any site at the request time for only $0.0002 per thumbnail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:<br />
Yeah i guess the question there, are the features im offering worth it.  AWS offers you thumbnails that they&#8217;ve taken at there last crawl of the web.  In my checking that means usually an monthly update.</p>
<p>Webthumb offers the following on top of AWS:<br />
Thumbs of sites how it looks today<br />
More thumbnail sizes<br />
Thumbnails from any url</p>
<p>What is doesn&#8217;t offer:<br />
Immediate thumbnails, getting your thumbnail is an async process since were making it of the site while you wait.</p>
<p>So i guess the services are similar but not the same, but its a certainty that even aws can&#8217;t sell thumbs of any site at the request time for only $0.0002 per thumbnail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shiflett</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34262</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shiflett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/08/29/webthumb-adds-login-and-quick-submit/#comment-34262</guid>
		<description>For pricing, you might keep AWS in mind, since they have an API for "Alexa Site Thumbnails" with a rate of $0.0002 per thumbnail. (A cost of $0.05 per thumbnail is 250 times more expensive than Amazon's offering.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For pricing, you might keep AWS in mind, since they have an API for &#8220;Alexa Site Thumbnails&#8221; with a rate of $0.0002 per thumbnail. (A cost of $0.05 per thumbnail is 250 times more expensive than Amazon&#8217;s offering.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
