<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML FAQ Answer: Other library integration plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:24:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Eichorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Eichorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>Ross: The autoload in scriptaculous is slower since it makes multiple http requests instead of one.  Also in a setup like this the scriptaculous auto load doesn&#039;t work since it can&#039;t figure out the correct path to use.

You could easily set it up as a couple different keys if you wanted but I find myself using everything but builder.js on a regular basis (guess i could drop that from my include) because of larger widgets i&#039;ve built so its just easier to pull it all in and let a single client side cache check be performed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross: The autoload in scriptaculous is slower since it makes multiple http requests instead of one.  Also in a setup like this the scriptaculous auto load doesn&#8217;t work since it can&#8217;t figure out the correct path to use.</p>
<p>You could easily set it up as a couple different keys if you wanted but I find myself using everything but builder.js on a regular basis (guess i could drop that from my include) because of larger widgets i&#8217;ve built so its just easier to pull it all in and let a single client side cache check be performed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/#comment-5835</guid>
		<description>Dam filtered, the content!

Include this as the source to load only the base and the effects lib.

 &#039;js/scriptaculous.js?effects&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dam filtered, the content!</p>
<p>Include this as the source to load only the base and the effects lib.</p>
<p> &#8216;js/scriptaculous.js?effects&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-5834</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/#comment-5834</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that scriptaculous - has its own auto loading functions - so all you need to include is scriptaculous.js

Also they have added url style get variables to specify what is included:

i.e.  including: 

Will load the base and the effects.js library..

Javascript compression - can be tricky - best bet is to gzip the output from the webserver...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that scriptaculous &#8211; has its own auto loading functions &#8211; so all you need to include is scriptaculous.js</p>
<p>Also they have added url style get variables to specify what is included:</p>
<p>i.e.  including: </p>
<p>Will load the base and the effects.js library..</p>
<p>Javascript compression &#8211; can be tricky &#8211; best bet is to gzip the output from the webserver&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Worms</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-5706</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Worms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/02/07/html-faq-answer-other-library-integration-plans/#comment-5706</guid>
		<description>That is really nice! 

Adding a Javascript compressor, would be a nice touch. One of the things I don&#039;t like about using javascript libraries is that to get what I need using libraries I don&#039;t just use 1 library, but have to load up a couple different libraries, which causes too much overhead.

If I could use take the JS libraries that I need and then load them up through HTML_AJAX, which would compress the js before serving it, that would rock.

Another thing that I&#039;ve wanted for a while is a way to create Javascript dependancies. For example I only need to use one effect out of a library, but instead of loading up the entire library I would use HTML_AJAX to call that effect. HTML_AJAX will then work out what functions are needed for that effect to work, compress the JS and serve it to me. That would rock ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really nice! </p>
<p>Adding a Javascript compressor, would be a nice touch. One of the things I don&#8217;t like about using javascript libraries is that to get what I need using libraries I don&#8217;t just use 1 library, but have to load up a couple different libraries, which causes too much overhead.</p>
<p>If I could use take the JS libraries that I need and then load them up through HTML_AJAX, which would compress the js before serving it, that would rock.</p>
<p>Another thing that I&#8217;ve wanted for a while is a way to create Javascript dependancies. For example I only need to use one effect out of a library, but instead of loading up the entire library I would use HTML_AJAX to call that effect. HTML_AJAX will then work out what functions are needed for that effect to work, compress the JS and serve it to me. That would rock <img src='http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
