http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/ The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:31:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4-alpha http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-742329 Josh on the Web » Blog Archive » Exploring PHP’s static scoping Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:52:42 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-742329 [...] PHP developers weren’t happy with the limitations of self; even Zend ran into it’s limitations. The lack of usable inheritance meant the utility of static methods was greatly reduced. Thankfully [...] [...] PHP developers weren’t happy with the limitations of self; even Zend ran into it’s limitations. The lack of usable inheritance meant the utility of static methods was greatly reduced. Thankfully [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-306123 Über ein neues, halbes Feature in PHP 5.3 im WEBTEAM Weblog Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:53:35 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-306123 [...] Martin Fowlers Entwurfsmuster Active Record, vor. Es wurde von einigen Bloggern sofort erkannt, dass dies mit PHP nicht umzusetzen ist. Das Problem ist eben, dass static binding in PHP kaputt [...] [...] Martin Fowlers Entwurfsmuster Active Record, vor. Es wurde von einigen Bloggern sofort erkannt, dass dies mit PHP nicht umzusetzen ist. Das Problem ist eben, dass static binding in PHP kaputt [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-225563 Ivan Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:50:05 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-225563 Here is my own version (Based on rails) php&mysql ActiveRecord pattern. Hope you like it. http://www.komdev.com.ar/ Here is my own version (Based on rails) php&mysql ActiveRecord pattern. Hope you like it.
http://www.komdev.com.ar/

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-169594 chazmeyers.com/blog » Broken static methods in PHP make me sad. Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:23:23 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-169594 [...] It seems I’m not the only person who was saddened by this. [...] [...] It seems I’m not the only person who was saddened by this. [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-90871 lineage2 Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:33:15 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-90871 ow the hell are you going to mock out persistence for testing, for example? ow the hell are you going to mock out persistence for testing, for example?

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-55878 Made Media Ltd » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:43:46 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55878 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails' ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can't pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-55202 Madeblog » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:52:53 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55202 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5989 Madeblog » Blog Archive » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:45:20 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5989 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5837 Joshua Eichorn Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:12:47 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5837 dgx: As hacks go its not a bad one. dgx: As hacks go its not a bad one.

]]> http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5832 dgx Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:49:07 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5832 Another solution (or agonized workaround?) http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325685 Another solution (or agonized workaround?) http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325685

]]>