Comments on: ZActiveRecord can’t work? http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/ The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:26:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1-alpha By: Über ein neues, halbes Feature in PHP 5.3 im WEBTEAM Weblog http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-306123 Über ein neues, halbes Feature in PHP 5.3 im WEBTEAM Weblog Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:53:35 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-306123 [...] Martin Fowlers Entwurfsmuster Active Record, vor. Es wurde von einigen Bloggern sofort erkannt, dass dies mit PHP nicht umzusetzen ist. Das Problem ist eben, dass static binding in PHP kaputt [...] [...] Martin Fowlers Entwurfsmuster Active Record, vor. Es wurde von einigen Bloggern sofort erkannt, dass dies mit PHP nicht umzusetzen ist. Das Problem ist eben, dass static binding in PHP kaputt [...]

]]> By: Ivan http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-225563 Ivan Tue, 10 Jul 2007 05:50:05 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-225563 Here is my own version (Based on rails) php&mysql ActiveRecord pattern. Hope you like it. http://www.komdev.com.ar/ Here is my own version (Based on rails) php&mysql ActiveRecord pattern. Hope you like it.
http://www.komdev.com.ar/

]]> By: chazmeyers.com/blog » Broken static methods in PHP make me sad. http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-169594 chazmeyers.com/blog » Broken static methods in PHP make me sad. Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:23:23 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-169594 [...] It seems I’m not the only person who was saddened by this. [...] [...] It seems I’m not the only person who was saddened by this. [...]

]]> By: lineage2 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-90871 lineage2 Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:33:15 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-90871 ow the hell are you going to mock out persistence for testing, for example? ow the hell are you going to mock out persistence for testing, for example?

]]> By: Made Media Ltd » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55878 Made Media Ltd » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:43:46 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55878 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails' ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can't pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> By: Madeblog » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55202 Madeblog » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:52:53 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-55202 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> By: Madeblog » Blog Archive » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5989 Madeblog » Blog Archive » ActiveRecord Angst… ReActivated. Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:45:20 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5989 [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...] [...] The thing I admire most about Rails’ ActiveRecord is the total clarity with which sub-classes represent the database table, and instances of those classes represent a row in that table. For well documented reasons, PHP5 still can’t pull off this representation, and so most attempts use workarounds that kind of get there in the end, but sacrifice all of the Ruby elegance along the way. [...]

]]> By: Joshua Eichorn http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5837 Joshua Eichorn Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:12:47 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5837 dgx: As hacks go its not a bad one. dgx: As hacks go its not a bad one.

]]> By: dgx http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5832 dgx Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:49:07 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5832 Another solution (or agonized workaround?) http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325685 Another solution (or agonized workaround?) http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325685

]]> By: Digital Sandwich http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5822 Digital Sandwich Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:02:29 +0000 http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2006/01/09/zactiverecord-cant-work/#comment-5822 <strong>Late Static Binding in PHP...</strong> I have just sent an e-mail to the internals list for PHP that implements late static binding. Many of you probably remember hearing about all of this a few months ago not too long after the Zend Framework webcast where they showed off an API that appea... Late Static Binding in PHP…

I have just sent an e-mail to the internals list for PHP that implements late static binding. Many of you probably remember hearing about all of this a few months ago not too long after the Zend Framework webcast where they showed off an API that appea…

]]>