<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerned about GWA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/06/concerned-about-gwa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/06/concerned-about-gwa/</link>
	<description>The weblog of Joshua Eichorn, AJAX, PHP and Open Source</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: c drozdowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/06/concerned-about-gwa/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>c drozdowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2005/05/06/concerned-about-gwa/#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>What comes to mind for me is the legality of such products. First, could caching then serving   content be a violation of laws regarding copyright and/or redistribution rights?

And what about this scenario- GWA caches and serves content from a website distributing child pornography. Should Google then be pushed onto the legal accountability stack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What comes to mind for me is the legality of such products. First, could caching then serving   content be a violation of laws regarding copyright and/or redistribution rights?</p>
<p>And what about this scenario- GWA caches and serves content from a website distributing child pornography. Should Google then be pushed onto the legal accountability stack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
